Three sources, one medical history
Issue 12 considers how to distinguish a claimant's account, referral material and existing clinical records in reports.
In this episode, Greg explores the gap between a well-prepared instruction pack and an independent medical report that actually addresses the point in dispute. It introduces a practical distinction: the volume of information a referrer sends is not the same as the clarity of the instruction the expert receives.
These are editorial listening notes, not a verbatim transcript or a substitute for the episode. Views are Greg's own; general commentary, not legal, clinical or professional advice.
Issue 12 considers how to distinguish a claimant's account, referral material and existing clinical records in reports.
What makes a report useful to the people who need to rely on its reasoning?
A related discussion of efficiency, transparency and independence in medicolegal work.